🧐 Just How Sure Do You REALLY Need to Be?


PRACTICAL PERSPECTIVES

ISSUE 12 | SNICKER SURE

On confidence, commitment, and the courage to act before you're certain.

When a Candy Bar Became a Confidence Check

In 7th grade, I had a science teacher with one unusual rule.

If you raised your hand to answer a question, he’d pause and ask:

“Are you Snicker sure?”

If you said yes and got it wrong, you owed him a Snickers bar.
No reward for being right—just a small, public cost for being wrong.

I don’t remember the subject.
But I do remember the mental math it forced every time:

  • Am I sure enough to risk it?
  • What if I’m wrong?
  • Do I answer—or stay quiet?

At the time, it felt like a game.
But now? I realize it was my first exposure to a pattern I see in leadership all the time:

The instinct to wait for certainty—before making a call that matters.

What Thoughtful Leaders Get Wrong About Certainty

Most leaders don’t stall because they’re unsure.
They stall because they care.

  • They want to get it right.
  • They want to protect the team.
  • They want the outcome to feel airtight before they move.

So they pause.
Add a slide.
Request one more opinion.

It doesn’t look like avoidance.
It looks like responsibility.

But underneath? It’s hesitation—disguised as diligence.
And over time, that hesitation becomes a habit.


The Confidence Threshold: A Tool for When You're Not 100% Sure

That’s why I use a decision tool with leaders I work with—something I call the Confidence Threshold.

It’s a mental checkpoint that helps you define how confident is confident enough—so you can act before perfect clarity arrives.

It’s not a rule or a formula.
It’s a mindset shift.

When you use it, you:

  • Reduce friction
  • Regain momentum
  • Model clarity—without pretending to be certain

Not every decision needs 100%.
Some need 85%.
Many just need you to move—so everyone else can.


The Science Behind the Strategy

This approach is rooted in a behavioral science principle called satisficing—coined by Nobel laureate Herbert Simon.

Satisficing means making a decision once you’ve reached a sufficient threshold of confidence—rather than chasing perfection.

In complex systems, satisficers:

  • Move faster
  • Adapt better
  • Experience less decision fatigue
  • Build more trust through timely action

Perfection is a delay strategy.
Process is what builds credibility.

Confidence isn’t about knowing how it ends.
It’s about knowing when it’s time to move.

Your Experiment: The Snicker Sure Test

Next time you’re circling a decision, try this:

🍫 The Snicker Sure Test

1. Write down the decision.
Name it clearly.

2. Estimate your current confidence.
Give it a %—no perfection required.

3. Set your threshold.
What level of confidence would be enough to move?

4. Identify what’s still missing.
Is it a fact? A conversation? Or just fear?

5. If you’re past the bar—act.
Decide. Communicate. Move forward.

Because most leaders aren’t waiting for more data.
They’re waiting for permission.


The Bottom Line: You Don’t Need to Be Fully Sure to Lead

You don’t need to be Snicker sure to lead.
You just need a clear threshold—and the courage to move when you’ve reached it.

The Confidence Threshold isn’t a guarantee.
It’s a leadership practice: one that helps you stop chasing certainty and start building clarity.

Bold leadership rarely feels ready.
But it often begins right at the moment you stop waiting to be sure.

📣 Pass It On: The Question Every Leader Should Ask

Know someone circling a decision they’ve already done the work to make?
Forward this.

And next time they hesitate, ask:

“What would it take for you to feel Snicker sure?”
And do you actually need to wait that long?

On LinkedIn? I’d love to hear:
What’s a decision you delayed—and what would’ve happened if 80% had been enough?

113 Cherry St #92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2205
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Science-Backed Leadership Tips You’ll Actually Use

Surprisingly simple, science-backed leadership strategies to help you win at work. Your ultimate field guide to success, crafted by an award-winning expert.

Read more from Science-Backed Leadership Tips You’ll Actually Use
Practical Perspectives | Issue 13 | SOFT LAUNCH on yellow background

PRACTICAL PERSPECTIVES ISSUE 13 | SOFT LAUNCH On timing, readiness, and the quiet power of starting before it counts. We tend to think of January as the clean slate.New year, new habits. That’s when we join gyms, commit to routines, and tell ourselves this year will be different. But here’s the thing: the best time to start a New Year’s resolution isn’t January. It’s October. Why Starting Early Works The first time I joined a gym, it was in the middle of October — classic behavioral science...

practical perspectives issue 14 TRUST FALL

PRACTICAL PERSPECTIVES ISSUE 12 | TRUST FALL On truth, timing, and the trust that makes it land. We were deep in launch planning.Cross-functional team. Big initiative. High visibility. The team proposed an approach I knew wouldn’t work.Not a guess—a hard-earned lesson. I’d watched this exact move fail in two other companies. But instead of sharing that context, I said: “They’ll never go for it.” No preamble. No rationale. No path forward. Just a hard stop. They went ahead anyway. And sure...

Practical Perspectives | Issue 13 | TRUTH OR DARE on yellow background

PRACTICAL PERSPECTIVES ISSUE 13 | TRUTH OR DARE On trust, storytelling, and why selling the dream can backfire. As leaders, we’re natural storytellers.We pitch the vision before all the pieces are in place.We recruit on future potential, not just current state.We keep teams motivated with milestones still out of reach. But here’s the trap:If the only story you tell is about upside, you’re building a fragile contract.And when reality hits — whether it’s a layoff, a missed funding round, or a...